State Ex Rel. Kemp v. Evans, Unpublished Decision (4-7-2004)
State Ex Rel. Kemp v. Evans, Unpublished Decision (4-7-2004)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} On March 29, 2004, the Respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action as moot. Attached thereto is a copy of a judgment entry filed under Common Pleas Case No. 88 CR 634, captioned State v. Thomas A. Kemp, wherein the trial court overruled Petitioner's motions asserting a conflict existed between himself and his defense counsel.
{¶ 3} In order to grant a writ of mandamus, the court must find that the petitioner has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, that the respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act and that the petitioner has no other plain and adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Hodges v. Taft
(1992),
{¶ 4} It is established law that a writ of mandamus will not issue to compel an act already performed. State ex rel.Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1996),
{¶ 5} As the trial court has proceeded to judgment, there is no further relief which this Court may provide. Petition dismissed as moot. Costs are taxed against Petitioner.
Waite, P.J., and Donofrio and Vukovich, JJ., concur.
Final order. Copy to counsel or unrepresented party pursuant to the civil rules.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.