Abbe Fam. F. and T. v. Portage Cty., Unpublished Decision (5-14-2004)

Ohio Court of Appeals
Abbe Fam. F. and T. v. Portage Cty., Unpublished Decision (5-14-2004), 2004 Ohio 2445 (2004)
CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, JUDGE.

Abbe Fam. F. and T. v. Portage Cty., Unpublished Decision (5-14-2004)

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION
{¶ 1} On March 4, 2004, appellant, Carolyn Abbe, filed a notice of appeal from a February 2, 2004 judgment of the Portage County Court of Common Pleas. Thus appellant's notice of appeal was filed thirty-one days after the judgment had been issued by the trial court. On March 17, 2004, appellees, Daniel C. Cadle, the Cadle Company, and Buckeye Retirement Company, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal as untimely. Appellant has not filed a response.

{¶ 2} App.R. 4(A) states:

{¶ 3} "A party shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within thirty days of the later of entry of the judgment or order appealed or, in a civil case, service of the notice of judgment and its entry if service is not made on the party within the three day period in Rule 58(B) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure."

{¶ 4} Loc.R. 5(C) of the Eleventh District Court of Appeals provides:

{¶ 5} "In the filing of a Notice of Appeal in civil cases in which the trial court clerk has not complied with Ohio Civ.R. 58(B), and the Notice of Appeal is deemed to be filed out ofrule, appellant shall attach an affidavit from the trial court clerk stating that service was not perfected pursuant to Ohio App.R. 4(A). The clerk shall then perfect service and furnish this Court with a copy of the appearance docket in which date of service has been noted. Lack of compliance shall result in thesua sponte dismissal of the appeal under Ohio App.R. 4(A)." (Emphasis sic.)

{¶ 6} In the present case, appellant has not complied with the thirty-day rule set forth in App.R. 4(A) nor has appellant alleged that there was a failure by the trial court clerk to comply with Civ.R. 58(B). The time requirement is jurisdictional in nature, and may not be enlarged by an appellate court. Stateex rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd of Elections (1988),40 Ohio St.3d 58, 60; App.R. 14(B).

{¶ 7} Accordingly, appellees' motion to dismiss this appeal is hereby granted.

{¶ 8} The appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Ford, P.J., and Christley, J., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Abbe Family Foundation and Trust (t.A.F.) v. Portage County Sheriff's Dept., Daniel C. Cadle, Mark Steven Colucci, New Party Carolyn Abbe, New Party
Cited By
1 case
Status
Unpublished