Asset Acceptance v. MacK, Unpublished Decision (3-18-2004)
Asset Acceptance v. MacK, Unpublished Decision (3-18-2004)
Dissenting Opinion
{¶ 8} I respectfully dissent.
{¶ 9} I participated in this Court's decision in Ucker v.Ucker (April 26, 1999), Fairfield App. No. 98CA00055, unreported. Upon revisiting Ucker, I now believe our decision therein was in error.
{¶ 10} I would adopt the rationale and holding of HuntingtonNational Bank v. Battaglia (March 25, 1994), Portage County App. Nos. 92-P-0100, 92-P-0101, unreported. In accordance therewith, I would reverse the trial court's judgment and remand the matter to it to recompute interest pursuant to Battaglia.
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} On August 4, 2003, appellee filed a motion to revive judgment. By judgment entry filed September 18, 2003, the trial court granted the motion with accrued interest from the original date of judgment.
{¶ 3} Appellant filed an appeal and this matter is now before this court for consideration. Assignment of error is as follows:
{¶ 6} The sole assignment of error is denied.
{¶ 7} The judgment of the Municipal Court of Ashland County, Ohio is hereby affirmed.
Edwards, J. concur.
Hoffman, P.J. dissents.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.