Bell v. Continental Casualty Company, Unpublished Decision (2-20-2004)
Bell v. Continental Casualty Company, Unpublished Decision (2-20-2004)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} Appellant, Kenneth J. Bell, filed UM/UIM claims as a "family member" pursuant to Scott-Pontzer against appellee, Continental Casualty Company ("CCC"), his father's employer's insurer. It is undisputed that the accident related to Bell's UM/UIM claims was unrelated to any vehicle driven by his father while acting within the scope of his employer's business.
{¶ 3} Pursuant to Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis,
{¶ 4} Bell's three assignments of error are not well-taken.
{¶ 5} The judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. Court costs of this appeal are assessed to appellant.
Judgment Affirmed.
Pietrykowski, J., Lanzinger, J. and Singer, J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.