Nixon v. Grange Mutual Casualty Company, Unpublished Decision (11-10-2004)
Nixon v. Grange Mutual Casualty Company, Unpublished Decision (11-10-2004)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} It is well settled that the law to be applied when an accident occurs depends on the law in effect at the beginning of the most recent two-year interval. Wolfe v. Wolfe,
{¶ 3} Therefore, the law in effect at the time of the accident prohibits appellant's recovery, as she did not suffer bodily injury. The issues of timely payment, cancellation, and notice are extraneous. The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of appellee. Appellant's assignments of error are overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant its costs herein taxed.
The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas to carry this judgment into execution.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
McMonagle, P.J., and Rocco, J., Concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.