Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004

Falls Elec. Contr. v. Tri-State Constr., Unpublished Decision (12-17-2004)

Falls Elec. Contr. v. Tri-State Constr., Unpublished Decision (12-17-2004)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided December 17, 2004 · JUDITH A. CHRISTLEY, J.
2004 Ohio 6952
Falls Elec. Contr. v. Tri-State Constr., Unpublished Decision (12-17-2004)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION
{¶ 1} On August 5, 2004, appellant, Tri-State Construction, filed a notice of appeal from a July 12, 2004 judgment of the Newton Falls Municipal Court. In that judgment, the trial court dismissed the case for improper venue.

{¶ 2} It is well established that a judgment dismissing a case for improper venue is not a final appealable order. Stateex rel. Allied Chemical Co. v. Aurelius (1984),16 Ohio App.3d 69; Snell v. Cincinnati St. Ry. Co. (1899), 60 Ohio St. 256.

{¶ 3} Accordingly, this appeal is hereby sua sponte dismissed due to lack of a final appealable order. We also note that William W. Bridge, III, who is not an attorney, is prohibited from representing a corporation in an appeal. A layperson can only represent themselves on appeal, and not another party.Vizzini v. Nichols, 11th Dist. No. 2003-P-0085, 2003-Ohio-6225.

Appeal dismissed.

Grendell, J., Westcott Rice, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.