State v. Brooks, Unpublished Decision (10-8-2004)
State v. Brooks, Unpublished Decision (10-8-2004)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} Oddly enough, the reason appellant offers for the late filing of his latest notice of appeal is that he was unaware of his right to appeal. This claim does not comport with the fact that appellant filed a notice of appeal three years earlier. Clearly, he was aware of his right to appeal at that time.
{¶ 3} While this court has the discretion to permit a delayed appeal pursuant to App.R. 5(A), we will not do so when an appellant waits seven years, has previously filed another delayed appeal, and gives us no valid reason to explain the delay.
{¶ 4} Appellant's motions for leave to file a delayed appeal and for appointment of counsel are hereby overruled.
{¶ 5} Appeal dismissed.
Westcott Rice, j., Grendell, J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.