State v. Solomon, Unpublished Decision (2-11-2004)
State v. Solomon, Unpublished Decision (2-11-2004)
Opinion of the Court
Defendant-appellant Tony Solomon appeals his conviction for carrying a concealed weapon, a violation of R.C.
On appeal, Solomon's counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,1 stating that counsel has conscientiously reviewed the record and can discern no reversible errors in the proceedings. Consequently, counsel has sought to withdraw from representation and has requested that this court, consistent with Anders, independently review the record to determine whether the proceedings below were free from prejudicial error.
The Ohio Supreme Court recently held in Klein v. Leis that R.C.
We have reviewed the record and can find no prejudicial error.
We conclude that Solomon's appeal is completely without merit and is wholly frivolous. Therefore, we overrule counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Although we hold that this appeal is frivolous under App.R. 23 and without "reasonable cause" under R.C.
Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall be sent to the trial court under App.R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App.R. 24.
Hildebrandt, P.J., Gorman and Painter, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.