Willoughby v. Beckwith, Unpublished Decision (4-18-2005)
Willoughby v. Beckwith, Unpublished Decision (4-18-2005)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} In reviewing this matter, it is clear that appellants could have appealed the March 3, 2004 judgment of the trial court regarding the forfeiture of bond. In the alternative, they could have appealed the August 9, 2004 judgment of the trial court denying their motion to vacate the bond forfeiture.
{¶ 3} However, it is well established that the filing of a motion for reconsideration from a final order in the trial court is a nullity. Pittsv. Dept. of Transportation (1981),
{¶ 4} Based upon the foregoing analysis, this appeal is hereby dismissed sua sponte as being untimely filed pursuant to App. R. 4(A).
{¶ 5} Appeal dismissed.
Ford, P.J., Grendell, J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.