Dawson v. Board of Mrdd, Unpublished Decision (9-9-2005)
Dawson v. Board of Mrdd, Unpublished Decision (9-9-2005)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} It is well-settled that "[a]n order denying a motion * * * for judgment on the pleadings is not reviewable until there is an appeal from an adverse judgment." S.O.S. Constr. Industries, Inc. v. Columbus Metro.Hous. Auth. (Jan. 7, 2003), 10th Dist. No. 02AP-655, 2003 WL 42446, at 2, citing State ex rel. Overmyer v. Walinski (1966),
{¶ 3} In the instant matter, the judgment entered by the trial court was interlocutory in nature, and the issue is not yet ripe for review. There was no order dismissing or terminating the case or an entry of judgment. An interlocutory order is simply not a final appealable order. Therefore, the order appealed from is not final. This court will not have jurisdiction until a final appealable order is issued.
{¶ 4} Based upon the foregoing analysis, this appeal is hereby, sua sponte, dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction.
{¶ 5} Appeal dismissed.
Grendell, J., Rice, J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.