State Ex Rel. Evans v. Common Pleas, Unpublished Decision (10-18-2005)
State Ex Rel. Evans v. Common Pleas, Unpublished Decision (10-18-2005)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} Respondent court has filed a motion for summary judgment attached to which is a copy of the findings of fact and conclusions of law which were received for filing by the clerk on May 19, 2005. Evans has not opposed the motion. Respondent court argues that relator's request for relief in this action in mandamus should be denied because respondent has performed the act requested by relator. We agree.
{¶ 3} There are other grounds for denying relief in this action.
"The petition is also deficient in several aspects. As was the case in [Griffin v. McFaul, Cuyahoga App. No. 81658, 2002-Ohio-4929], [petitioner] has failed to: support his complaint with an affidavit specifying the details of the claim as required by Local Rule 45(B)(1)(a); * * *; and support his complaint with the affidavit required by R.C.
Kittrell v. Adult Parole Auth., Cuyahoga App. No. 81744, 2002-Ohio-5574, at ¶ 2. Similarly, Evans has not complied with these requirements. We also note that, although Evans attaches a "Poverty Affidavit" to his complaint, he has not signed the affidavit and the affidavit is not notarized. See R.C.R.C.
{¶ 4} Accordingly, respondent's motion for summary judgment is granted. Respondent to pay costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).
Writ denied.
McMonagle, J. Concurs Corrigan, J., Concurs
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.