Watson v. Lapoint Discount Auto, Unpublished Decision (9-30-2005)
Watson v. Lapoint Discount Auto, Unpublished Decision (9-30-2005)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} "The Decision of the Trial Court is not Supported by Reliable, Probative and Substantial Evidence and is Therefore, Arbitrary and Capricious and Constitutes an Abuse of Discretion."
{¶ 3} Appellant's sole assignment of error requires consideration of the evidence presented. Therefore, appellant had the duty to provide a transcript to support its assignment of error. App. R. 9(B) and Knapp v.Edwards Laboratories (1980),
{¶ 4} Appellant is ordered to pay the costs of this appeal pursuant to App. R. 24. Judgment for the clerk's expense incurred in preparation of the record, fees allowed by law, and the fee for filing the appeal is awarded to Lucas County.
Judgment affirmed.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App. R. 27. See, also, 6th Dist. Loc. App. R. 4, amended 1/1/98.
Handwork, J., Pietrykowski, J., Skow, J., Concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.