Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005

State v. Beauregard, Unpublished Decision (7-21-2005)

State v. Beauregard, Unpublished Decision (7-21-2005)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided July 21, 2005 · MICHAEL J. CORRIGAN, JUDGE.
2005 Ohio 3722

State v. Beauregard, Unpublished Decision (7-21-2005)

Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY and OPINION
{¶ 1} The state appeals from a dismissal of four separate criminal indictments on grounds that it failed to produce at a pretrial an out-of-state witness. We dismiss the appeal for want of a final, appealable order because the order itself is considered to be without prejudice. See City of Fairview Park v. Fleming (Dec. 7, 2000), Cuyahoga App. Nos. 77323 and 77324 (dismissal of a criminal complaint cannot be considered a proceeding ancillary to the action; therefore, the dismissal of a criminal complaint, without prejudice, is not a final order, and the court lacks jurisdiction to consider it); State v. Steel, Cuyahoga App. No. 85076, 2005-Ohio-2623 at ¶ 6.

{¶ 2} This appeal is dismissed.

It is, therefore, ordered that appellees recover of appellant their costs herein taxed.

It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the Common Pleas Court to carry this judgment into execution.

A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Calabrese, Jr., P.J., Kilbane, J., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.