Norwalk Mk. Inc. v. McCormick, Unpublished Decision (4-24-2006)
Norwalk Mk. Inc. v. McCormick, Unpublished Decision (4-24-2006)
2006 Ohio 2120
Norwalk Mk. Inc. v. McCormick, Unpublished Decision (4-24-2006)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} A claim of a frivolous appeal under App.R. 23 is not a grounds for dismissal of an appeal, rather, it is a basis on which the court can award sanctions against the party filing the frivolous appeal. The court cannot determine whether an appeal is frivolous prior to hearing the appeal on its merits after full briefing and review of the record. Accordingly, the court denies the motion to dismiss. Appellee can file a motion for sanctions under App.R. 23 which the court will consider at the time the case is decided on its merits.
{¶ 3} It is so ordered.
Handwork, J., Pietrykowski, J., Singer, P.J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.