State v. McCarty, Unpublished Decision (2-27-2006)
State v. McCarty, Unpublished Decision (2-27-2006)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} As his sole assignment of error, McCarty claims the trial court erred by sentencing him to post-release control when it failed to advise McCarty at his sentencing hearing that he would be subject to post-release control.
{¶ 3} McCarty pled guilty to two second-degree felony counts which require the imposition of a three-year term of post-release control. See R.C.
{¶ 4} Under these circumstances, the trial court failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of R.C.
{¶ 5} Accordingly, McCarty's assignment of error is well-taken. McCarty's convictions are affirmed. The sentence, however, is hereby vacated and the matter remanded to the trial court for resentencing.
Powell, P.J., and Young, J., concur.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State of Ohio v. Joshua S. McCarty
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Unpublished