State v. Green, Unpublished Decision (3-31-2006)
State v. Green, Unpublished Decision (3-31-2006)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} "I. The trial court erred in sentencing the defendant by not imposing a minimum sentence, in violation of R.C. §
{¶ 3} "II. Sentencing in this case violated the Apprendi doctrine as explained in Blakely v. Washington and was therefore unconstitutional."
{¶ 4} Upon review, we find that this case is controlled by the Supreme Court of Ohio's decision in State v. Foster,
___ Ohio St.3d ___,
{¶ 5} On consideration whereof, this court finds that the Sandusky County Court of Common Pleas erred in sentencing appellant and the judgment is reversed. The sentence is hereby vacated and the case is remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with Foster. The state is ordered to pay the costs of this appeal pursuant to App.R. 24. Judgment for the clerk's expense incurred in preparation of the record, fees allowed by law, and the fee for filing the appeal is awarded to Sandusky County.
Judgment Reversed.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27. See, also, 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 4, amended 1/1/98.
Handwork, J., Pietrykowski, J., Skow, J. concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.