Discover Bank v. Desai, Unpublished Decision (9-14-2006)
Discover Bank v. Desai, Unpublished Decision (9-14-2006)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} The underlying action was settled and dismissed with prejudice at plaintiff's cost on August 18, 2004. On July 29, 2005, plaintiff moved the court to vacate the dismissal entry. The court denied this motion on August 16, 2005. On August 31, 2005, plaintiff filed a second motion for relief from judgment. A magistrate denied this motion in an order journalized September 9, 2005. Plaintiff's appeal from this order was dismissed for lack of a final appealable order, but was reinstated after the trial court denied plaintiff's motion to reconsider the magistrate's decision.
{¶ 3} The motion for relief from judgment which is the subject of the present appeal was based on the same grounds asserted in the July 29, 2005 motion to vacate which the court had previously denied. "`Res judicata prevents the successive filings of Civ.R. 60(B) motions [for] relief from a valid, final judgment when based upon the same facts and same grounds or based upon facts that could have been raised in the prior motion.'"Harris v. Anderson,
Affirmed.
It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant his costs herein taxed.
The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
It is ordered that a special mandate be sent to said court to carry this judgment into execution.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Rocco, Judge Gallagher, P.J. and MIlligan, J.* Concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.