State v. George, Unpublished Decision (9-21-2006)
State v. George, Unpublished Decision (9-21-2006)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} The assignments are overruled because George has not demonstrated, either by means of a transcript or citation to appropriate legal authority, a manifest injustice sufficient to find that this post-sentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea should be granted. See Crim.R. 32.1; State v. Xie (1992),
Judgment affirmed.
It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant its costs herein taxed.
The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the Common Pleas Court to carry this judgment into execution. The defendant's conviction having been affirmed, any bail pending appeal is terminated. Case remanded to the trial court for execution of sentence.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Dyke, A.J., and Calabrese, Jr., J., Concur.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State of Ohio v. Anthony George
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Unpublished