State v. Fagan, Unpublished Decision (3-17-2006)
State v. Fagan, Unpublished Decision (3-17-2006)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} "THE TRIAL COURT ERRED THROUGH SENTENCING APPELLANT TO A NON-MINIMUM PRISON SENTENCE BASED ON FACTS NOT FOUND BY THE JURY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT NOR ADMITTED BY APPELLANT.
{¶ 3} "APPELLANT WAS DENIED HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL."
{¶ 4} In Fagan's Second Assignment of Error, he argues that if he failed to preserve the issue raised in his First Assignment of Error, then his trial counsel was ineffective for having failed to preserve that issue. In response to Fagan's Second Assignment of Error, the State concedes that he did preserve the issue raised for appellate review in his First Assignment of Error. We agree.
{¶ 5} Fagan received a seventeen-month sentence for Vehicular Assault, a fourth-degree felony, and a five-month sentence for Operating a Vehicle Under the Influence, a first-degree misdemeanor. The two sentences were ordered to be served concurrently. The minimum sentence for a fourth-degree felony is six months. R.C.
{¶ 6} Fagan's Second Assignment of Error is overruled. His First Assignment of Error is sustained upon the authority ofState v. Foster, supra. The sentence imposed by the trial court is Reversed, and this cause is Remanded for re-sentencing.
Brogan and Valen, JJ., concur.
(Hon. Anthony Valen, Retired from the Twelfth Appellate District, Sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Ohio).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.