State v. Lavery, 2007-Ca-34 (10-16-2007)
State v. Lavery, 2007-Ca-34 (10-16-2007)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} Appellant raises two assignments of error:
{¶ 3} I. THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR, HARMFUL ERROR AND/OR ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN FINDING APPELLANT GUILTY AND IMPOSING SENTENCES.
{¶ 4} II. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED AND/OR ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS.
{¶ 5} The record shows appellant originally pled not guilty, but changed his plea to no contest after the court overruled his motion to suppress.
{¶ 6} Appellee, the State of Ohio, concedes appellant's first assignment of error and agrees the trial court did not comply with R.C.
{¶ 7} Accordingly, the first assignment of error is sustained.
{¶ 8} Appellant's second assignment of error is overruled as moot. *Page 3 {¶ 9} For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the Licking County Municipal
Court is reversed, and pursuant to App. R. 12(B) we enter final judgment of acquittal.
*Page 4By: Delaney, J., Gwin, P.J. and Wise, J. concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.