First Energy Solutions v. Firth Rd. Real., Unpublished Decision (8-30-2007)
First Energy Solutions v. Firth Rd. Real., Unpublished Decision (8-30-2007)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} First Energy filed suit against Firth Road alleging money due and owing on Firth Road's account for electrical service with First Energy. In its complaint, First Energy sought judgment "in the amount of $6,030.17, together with pre-judgment and postjudgment interest at the statutory rate from April 4, 2003 * * *."
{¶ 3} The trial court subsequently granted First Energy's motion for summary judgment. In its judgment entry, the trial court ruled that "First Energy Solutions Corp. is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Defendant owes Plaintiff the *Page 2 remaining balance of $6,030.17." The trial court's judgment entry did not address First Energy's demand for prejudgment interest.
{¶ 4} Under R.C.
{¶ 5} Generally, orders that determine liability but defer the issue of damages are not final appealable orders under R.C.
{¶ 6} Although "prejudgment interest is neither damages nor an easily computed cost," it is "more in the nature of damages." Miller v. FirstInternatl. Fidelity Trust Bldg. Ltd.,
{¶ 7} Here, the trial court's judgment entry granting summary judgment to First Energy did not address First Energy's demand for prejudgment interest. Accordingly, the judgment is not final and, therefore, we dismiss for lack of a final, appealable order. Dismissed.
*Page 3It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
*Page 1ANTHONY O. CALABRESE, JR., P.J., and MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J., CONCUR
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.