State v. Cressel, 21872 (5-25-2007)
State v. Cressel, 21872 (5-25-2007)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} A timely appeal was filed on Cressel's behalf and different counsel was appointed to prosecute the appeal. On February 21, 2007, appointed appellate counsel filed an Anders brief pursuant to Anders v.California (1967),
{¶ 3} Pursuant to our responsibilities under Anders, we have conducted an independent review of the entire record and, having done so, we agree with the assessment of appointed appellate counsel that there are no arguably meritorious issues to present on appeal, and that this appeal is wholly frivolous.
{¶ 4} Accordingly, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.
*Page 1GRADY, J., and DONOVAN, J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.