State v. Adkins, 2007 Ca 39 (5-2-2008)
State v. Adkins, 2007 Ca 39 (5-2-2008)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} Counsel was appointed to represent Adkins on appeal, and on December 17, 2007, appointed appellate counsel filed an Anders brief pursuant to Anders v. California (1967),
{¶ 3} We notified Adkins by magistrate's order of February 4, 2008, that his appointed appellate counsel had filed an Anders brief, and of the significance of an Anders brief. We afforded Adkins sixty days within which to assert any assignments of error in a pro se brief. As of April 17, 2008, Adkins has filed nothing with this court.
{¶ 4} Appointed appellate counsel suggests as two possible assignments of error that the application of State v. Foster,
{¶ 5} Pursuant to our responsibilities under Anders, we have conducted an independent review of the record on appeal and agree with the assessment of appointed appellate counsel that there are no meritorious issues for appellate review, and we further conclude that this appeal is entirely frivolous.
{¶ 6} The judgment appealed from will be affirmed. *Page 3
*Page 1GRADY, J. and DONOVAN, J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.