In Re A.C., Ca2007-05-134 (3-3-2008)
In Re A.C., Ca2007-05-134 (3-3-2008)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} Counsel for appellant, Emily F., filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California (1967),
{¶ 3} Appellant has filed a pro se brief raising an assignment of error pertaining to whether the trial court's award of permanent custody was supported by clear and convincing evidence. We note that we are limited in our examination of the record as it existed at the time of the hearing on the permanent custody motion and may not consider what has transpired since the hearing.
{¶ 4} We have examined the record, the potential assignment of error presented in counsel's brief, and the assignment of error in appellant's pro se brief and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. Therefore, the motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.
*Page 1WALSH, P.J., BRESSLER and YOUNG, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.