Cofield v. Buchanan, 90957 (4-23-2008)
Cofield v. Buchanan, 90957 (4-23-2008)
2008 Ohio 1931
Cofield v. Buchanan, 90957 (4-23-2008)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss attached to which is a copy of the journal entry received for filing by the clerk on February 21, 2008, granting motions to dismiss filed by both relator and the prosecutor. Relator has not opposed the motion. Respondent argues that this action in procedendo is, therefore, moot. We agree.
{¶ 3} Accordingly, respondent's motion to dismiss is granted. Respondent to pay costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).
Complaint dismissed.
*Page 1CHRISTINE T. MCMONAGLE, J., and FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J., CONCUR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.