Talik v. Fed. Marine Terminals, 87073 (5-1-2008)
Talik v. Fed. Marine Terminals, 87073 (5-1-2008)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} In his second assignment of error, Talik argues that even if the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act ("LHWCA") preempts his intentional tort claim (as has now been determined by the Supreme Court), the trial court still erred in granting Federal Marine's motion for summary judgment because the exclusivity provisions of the LHWCA are in the nature of an affirmative defense, and were waived by Federal Marine because they were never raised as such. We disagree.
{¶ 3} Federal Marine raised subject matter jurisdiction as an affirmative defense in its answer. Because Ohio is a notice-pleading state, Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.,
{¶ 4} assertion of that affirmative defense was sufficient. Accordingly, Talik's second assignment of error is overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed.
The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
It is ordered that a special mandate be sent to said court to carry this judgment into execution.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, P.J., and KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., CONCUR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.