State v. Hamilton, Ca2008-01-024 (12-8-2008)
State v. Hamilton, Ca2008-01-024 (12-8-2008)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} Counsel for appellant has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California (1967),
{¶ 3} Appellant has filed a pro se brief raising assignments of error pertaining to ineffective assistance of counsel, sentencing errors, and the trial court's prejudice against appellant.
{¶ 4} We have examined the record, the potential assignment of error presented in counsel's brief, and the assignments of error in appellant's pro se brief and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. Therefore, the motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.
*Page 1WALSH, P.J., BRESSLER and YOUNG, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.