Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008

State Ex Rel. Santos v. McDonnell, 90659 (1-22-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided January 22, 2008 · FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J.:

2008 Ohio 214

Cases that cite this one

13 later published cases cite this decision.

Strowder v. Astrab (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
State ex rel. Thigpen v. Sutula (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
State ex rel. Walker v. Donnelly (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
Henderson v. Saffold (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
Walter v. State (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State ex rel. Jackson v. Villanueva (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State ex rel. Woodard v. Ambrose (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State v. Diggs (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
France v. Celebrezze (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
State Ex Rel. Rose v. McGinty, 92578 (2-2-2009) (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)
Jones v. McGinty, 92602 (3-18-2009) (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)
Leon v. Cuyahoga County Ct. of Common Pleas, 92826 (3-27-2009) (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)
State Ex Rel. Potter v. Corrigan, 92245 (12-5-2008) (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION{¶ 1} Relator, Olyn Santos, requests that this court compel respondent judge to rule on the "motion to vacate and or modify sentence" filed by Santos in State v. Santos, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-455242 on March 28, 2007.

{¶ 2} Respondent has filed a motion for summary judgment attached to which is a copy of a journal entry issued by respondent and received for filing by the clerk on May 24, 2007 in which respondent denied the "motion to vacate and or modify sentence." Relator has not opposed the motion for summary judgment. As a consequence, this action in mandamus is moot.

{¶ 3} Santos's complaint and supporting documentation also are defective in ways that require dismissal. He has not included the addresses of the parties in the caption as required by Civ.R. 10(A).State ex rel. Hall v. Calabrese (Aug. 16, 2001), Cuyahoga App. No. 79810, at 2. Also, he has failed to include a certified copy of the prison cashier's statement of the balance in his inmate account as required by R.C. 2969.25(C). State ex rel. Bristow v. Sidoti (Dec. 1, 2000), Cuyahoga App. No. 78708, at 3-4. Likewise, in this action, we deny relator's claim of indigency and order him to pay costs. Additionally, "[t]he failure to comply with R.C. 2969.25 warrants dismissal of the complaint for a writ of mandamus. State ex rel. Zandersv. Ohio Parole Board (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 421, 696 N.E.2d 594 andState ex rel. *Page 4 Alford v. Winters (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 285, 685 N.E.2d 1242."State ex rel. Hite v. State, Cuyahoga App. No. 79734, 2002-Ohio-807, at 6.

{¶ 4} We also note that the "Verification of the Facts" merely recites that "all the facts in the aforementioned complaint are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge." Santos's use of this conclusory statement is not sufficient to comply with the Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1) requirement that the affidavit must specify the details of the claim.Turner v. Russo, Cuyahoga App. No. 87852, 2006-Ohio-4490, at ¶ 8.

{¶ 5} Accordingly, respondent's motion for summary judgment is granted. Relator to pay costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).

Writ denied.

KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., and MELODY J. STEWART, J., CONCUR.

*Page 1

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.