State Ex Rel. Muff v. Wollenberg, 08-Ca-11 (9-17-2008)
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Dixon v. Hunt (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2020)
- Dew v. Vivo (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
- State ex rel. Dominguez v. State (Ohio 2011)
- State v. Pendleton (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} Relator presented a criminal complaint to Respondent against Joseph A. Flautt for Tampering with Evidence, a felony of the third degree. Attached to the Complaint is an affidavit signed by Relator which appears to purport to be filed in compliance with R.C.
{¶ 3} To be entitled to the issuance of a writ of mandamus, relator must demonstrate: (1) a clear legal right to the relief prayed for; (2) a clear legal duty on the respondent's part to perform the act; and, (3) that there exists no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State ex rel. Master v. Cleveland (1996),
{¶ 4} We find Relator does not have a clear legal right to the relief prayed for nor does Respondent have a clear legal duty to perform the requested act.
{¶ 5} Relator relies on R.C.
{¶ 6} 2935.09 Accusation by affidavit to cause arrest or prosecution
{¶ 7} (A) As used in this section, "reviewing official" means a judge of a court of record, the prosecuting attorney or attorney charged by law with the prosecution of offenses in a court or before a magistrate, or a magistrate. *Page 3
{¶ 8} (B) In all cases not provided by sections
{¶ 9} (C) A peace officer who seeks to cause an arrest or prosecution under this section may file with a reviewing official or the clerk of a court of record an affidavit charging the offense committed.
{¶ 10} (D) A private citizen having knowledge of the facts who seeks to cause an arrest or prosecution under this section may file an affidavit charging the offense committed with a reviewing official for the purpose of review to determine if a complaint should be filed by the prosecuting attorney or attorney charged by law with the prosecution of offenses in the court or before the magistrate. A private citizen may file an affidavit charging the offense committed with the clerk of a court of record before or after the normal business hours of the reviewing officials if the clerk's office is open at those times. A clerk who receives an affidavit before or after the normal business hours of the reviewing officials shall forward it to a reviewing official when the reviewing official's normal business hours resume.
{¶ 11} R.C. §
{¶ 12} R.C.
{¶ 13} WRIT DENIED. *Page 4
{¶ 14} COSTS TO RELATOR.
Hoffman, P.J. Wise, J. and Edwards, J. concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.