State Ex Rel. Bobbitt v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 91341 (6-18-2008)
State Ex Rel. Bobbitt v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 91341 (6-18-2008)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} Sua sponte, we find that a review of Bobbitt's complaint for a writ of mandamus demonstrates improper venue. Bobbitt specifically seeks mandamus *Page 3
against the Ohio Adult Parole Authority, which is located in Columbus, Ohio. Bobbitt's cause of action arose where the Ohio Adult Parole Authority conducts its business and where the alleged wrong occurred.State ex rel. Davis v. Ghee (1998),
{¶ 3} Improper venue, however, does not mandate dismissal of the complaint for a writ of mandamus. Civ. R. 3(C)(1) warrants transfer of the complaint to the proper forum. Singleton v. Dennys Inc. (1987),
{¶ 4} Accordingly, this action is transferred to the Tenth Appellate District for Franklin County, where venue is proper. Costs waived.
Complaint transferred.
*Page 1COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, P.J., and SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State of Ohio, Ex Rel., Curtis Bobbitt, Relator v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Unpublished