State Ex Rel. Williams v. Villanueva, 92318 (1-12-2009)
State Ex Rel. Williams v. Villanueva, 92318 (1-12-2009)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} Initially, we note that the petition is fatally defective. Williams failed to support his complaint with an affidavit "specifying the details of the claim" as required by Local Rule 45(B)(1)(a).State ex rel. Wilson v. Calabrese (Jan. 18, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 70077; State ex rel. Smith v. McMonagle (July 17, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 70899.
{¶ 3} Nevertheless, attached to the motion for summary judgment is a copy of a journal entry which indicates that on December 8, 2008, Judge Villanueva denied Williams' second petition for post-conviction relief. Since this is Williams' second post-conviction relief petition, Judge Villanueva does not have a duty to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law. Stewart v. Judge Daniel O. Corrigan (Apr. 11, 2002), Cuyahoga App. No. 80639. Accordingly, since Judge Villanueva denied Williams' motion, we find that Williams' petition for a writ of mandamus is moot. State ex rel. Grant v. Coleman (1983),
{¶ 4} Accordingly, we grant Judge Villanueva's motion for summary judgment and deny Williams' petition for a writ of mandamus. Relator to bear costs. It is further ordered that the clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and date of entry pursuant to Civ. R. 58(B).
Writ denied.
*Page 1MARY EILEEN KILBANE, P.J., and CHRISTINE T. McMONAGLE, J., CONCUR
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.