State v. Reed, 2008-Ca-02 (1-16-2009)
State v. Reed, 2008-Ca-02 (1-16-2009)
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 2} Reed argues in his sole assignment that he was improperly convicted because violations of the township resolution and R.C.
{¶ 3} R.C.
{¶ 4} The Township amended the township resolution on October 16, 2007 to provide that a violation of the resolution would be a misdemeanor carrying a maximum fine of $500. This amendment, however, could have no application to Reed since he was alleged to have committed the "offense" on January 23, 2006. The Appellant's assignment of error is Sustained. The judgment of the trial court is Reversed.
WOLFF, J., and FAIN, J., concur.
Copies mailed to:
Ronald C. Lewis Patrick J. Conboy Hon. Michael K. Murry *Page 1
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.