Ohio Court of Claims, 2010

Knaebel v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.

Knaebel v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.
Ohio Court of Claims · Decided November 15, 2010 · Borchert
2010 Ohio 6674

Knaebel v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.

Opinion

[Cite as Knaebel v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 2010-Ohio-6674.]

Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

SETH KNAEBEL Plaintiff v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Defendant Case No. 2010-08039-AD Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert MEMORANDUM DECISION

FINDINGS OF FACT {¶ 1} 1) Plaintiff, Seth Knaebel, filed this action against defendant, Department of Transportation (ODOT), alleging that he suffered property damage to his car as a proximate cause of negligence on the part of ODOT in maintaining a hazardous condition on US Route 33/161 in Franklin County. Plaintiff related he was traveling west on US Route 33/161 on February 18, 2010, at approximately 1:00 a.m. when his vehicle struck a pothole in the right lane “soon after passing under Avery Road.” The impact of striking the pothole caused tire and wheel damage to plaintiff’s vehicle. In his complaint, plaintiff requested damages in the amount of $499.00, the stated cost of replacement parts and automotive repair expenses. The filing fee was paid. {¶ 2} 2) Defendant filed an investigation report requesting plaintiff’s claim be dismissed due to the fact the City of Dublin and not ODOT bears the maintenance responsibility for the section of US Route 33/161 where plaintiff’s incident occurred. In support of the request to dismiss, ODOT stated, “[d]efendant has performed an Case No. 2006-03532-AD -2- MEMORANDUM DECISION

Case No. 2006-03532-AD -2- MEMORANDUM DECISION

investigation of this site and the City of Dublin takes care of this section of US 33/161 (see attached map and Exhibit A).” Defendant submitted documentation (Exhibit A) showing that the particular section of US Route 33/161 in the vicinity of the Avery Road overpass is located within the maintenance jurisdiction of the City of Dublin. ODOT advised, “[a]s such, this section of roadway is not within the maintenance jurisdiction of defendant.” The site of the damage-causing incident was located in the City of Dublin. {¶ 3} 3) Plaintiff countered that the roadway area where his property damage occurred is under the maintenance jurisdiction of ODOT. Plaintiff did not produce evidence to establish ODOT maintains the particular section of US Route 33/161 in the vicinity of the Avery Road overpass.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW {¶ 4} 1) R.C. 2743.10(A) provides: {¶ 5} “(A) ‘State’ means the state of Ohio, including, but not limited to, the general assembly, the supreme court, the offices of all elected state officers, and all departments, boards, offices, commissions, agencies, institutions, and other instrumentalities of the state. ‘State’ does not include political subdivisions.” {¶ 6} 2) R.C. 2743.02(A)(1) states in pertinent part: Case No. 2006-03532-AD -3- MEMORANDUM DECISION

{¶ 7} “(A)(1) The state hereby waives its immunity from liability, except as provided for the office of the state fire marshal in division (G)(1) of section 9.60 and division (B) of section 3737.221 of the Revised Code and subject to division (H) of this section, and consents to be sued, and have its liability determined, in the court of claims created in this chapter in accordance with the same rules of law applicable to suits between private parties, except that the determination of liability is subject to the limitations set forth in this chapter and, in the case of state universities or colleges, in section 3345.40 of the Revised Code, and except as provided in division (A)(2) or (3) of this section. to the extent that the state has previously consented to be sued, this chapter has no applicability.” {¶ 8} 3) R.C. 5501.31 in pertinent part states: {¶ 9} “Except in the case of maintaining, repairing, erecting traffic signs on, or pavement marking of state highways within villages, which is mandatory as required by section 5521.01 of the Revised Code, and except as provided in section 5501.49 of the Revised Code, no duty of constructing, reconstructing, widening, resurfacing, maintaining, or repairing state highways within municipal corporations, or the bridges and culverts thereon, shall attach to or rest upon the director . . .” {¶ 10} The site of the damage-causing incident was not within the maintenance jurisdiction of defendant. Consequently, plaintiff’s case is dismissed.

Case No. 2006-03532-AD -4- MEMORANDUM DECISION

Case No. 2006-03532-AD -4- MEMORANDUM DECISION

Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

SETH KNAEBEL Plaintiff v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Defendant Case No. 2010-08039-AD Case No. 2006-03532-AD -5- MEMORANDUM DECISION

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert

ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION

Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth above, plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED. The court shall absorb the court costs of this case.

________________________________ DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk Entry cc: Seth Knaebel Jolene M. Molitoris, Director 10090 Corona Lane Department of Transportation Plain City, Ohio 43064 1980 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43223 RDK/laa 10/21 Filed 11/15/10 Sent to S.C. reporter 2/18/11

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.