Ohio Court of Claims, 2010

Tribble v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. Safety

Tribble v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. Safety
Ohio Court of Claims · Decided January 22, 2010 · Borchert
2010 Ohio 2023

Tribble v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. Safety

Opinion

[Cite as Tribble v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. Safety, 2010-Ohio-2023.]

Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us

VICTORIA TRIBBLE Plaintiff v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Defendant Case No. 2009-06460-AD Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert

ENTRY OF DISMISSAL

{¶ 1} On July 22, 2009, plaintiff, Victoria Tribble, filed a complaint against defendant, Ohio State Highway Patrol. Plaintiff alleges on January 9, 2009 between 10:30 a.m. and 11:00 a.m., she sustained personal injury tripping over a lift and falling into a puddle of water. Plaintiff contends defendant’s agent’s negligent parking caused her to exit the vehicle and sustain injury. Plaintiff contends she incurred medical expenses and work loss but did not supply any medical records or bill or a statement from her employer. She asserted the damages amounted to $249.47. {¶ 2} Defendant filed a motion to dismiss. In support of the motion to dismiss, defendant stated in pertinent part: {¶ 3} “As part of the investigation regarding Ms. Tribble’s complaint, the Patrol requested medical invoices from the hospital and a record from the employer verifying the dates of absence (Please see attached, Defendant’s letter to Plaintiff, Exhibit 1).

The Patrol has requested this documentation from the Plaintiff to create a complete and thorough investigation report, but Plaintiff has failed to respond to this request. As of Case No. 2009-06460-AD -2- ENTRY the date of this Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff has yet to respond to the Patrol’s request for more information.” {¶ 4} In order to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, the plaintiff must assert that defendant owed her a duty, breached that duty and the breach of the duty proximately caused her injuries. Armstrong v. Best Buy Company, Inc., 99 Ohio St. 3d 79, 2003-Ohio-2573. In other words, plaintiff must present sufficient evidence necessary to require defendant to proceed with the case. {¶ 5} In the case at bar, plaintiff has failed to do so. She has presented no medical records or bills or presented the name of her employer and the time she allegedly lost from work. Therefore, defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED.

Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The court shall absorb the court costs of this case.

________________________________ DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk Entry cc: Victoria Tribble Zachary M. Swisher 2006 West Galbraith Road Ohio Department of Public Safety Cincinnati, Ohio 45239 P.O. Box 182074 Columbus, Ohio 43218-2074 DRB/laa Filed 1/22/10 Sent to S.C. reporter 5/7/10

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.