Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014

Warlin v. Seranno

Warlin v. Seranno
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided January 21, 2014 · Farmer
2014 Ohio 187

Warlin v. Seranno

Opinion

[Cite as Warlin v. Seranno, 2014-Ohio-187.]

COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

CHAD WARLIN : JUDGES: : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J.

Relator : Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J. : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. -vs- : : Case No. 13 CAD 10 0075 : FOOD SERVICE MANAGER : OPINION SERANNO, ET AL : : Respondents :

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Mandamus

JUDGMENT: DISMISSED

DATE OF JUDGMENT: January 21, 2014

APPEARANCES: For Relator For Respondents Chad Warlin #07880-040 JOHN J. STARK P.O. Box 33 Assistant United States Attorney Terre Haute, Indiana 47808 303 Marconi Blvd., Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43215 Delaware County, Case No. 13 CAD 10 0075 2 Farmer, J.

{¶1} Relator, Chad Warlin, has filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus against certain federal prison employees. Warlin seeks to have this Court order Respondents to correct alleged food service violations. Respondents have filed a motion to dismiss.

{¶2} To be entitled to the issuance of a writ of mandamus, the Relator must demonstrate: (1) a clear legal right to the relief prayed for; (2) a clear legal duty on the respondent's part to perform the act; and, (3) that there exists no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State ex rel. Master v. Cleveland (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 23, 26-27, 661 N.E.2d 180; State ex rel. Harris v. Rhodes (1978), 5 Ohio St.2d 41, 324 N.E.2d 641, citing State ex rel.National City Bank v. Bd. of Education (1977) 520 Ohio St.2d 81, 369 N.E.2d 1200.

{¶3} A prerequisite to issuing a writ of mandamus is for this Court to have jurisdiction over the named respondents. All respondents are located in the state of Indiana. All respondents are employees of the federal prison system. This Court lacks jurisdiction to order the named respondents to perform any acts.

Delaware County, Case No. 13 CAD 10 0075 3

{¶4} For these reasons, the Motion to Dismiss is granted. The Petition for Writ of Mandamus is dismissed.

By Farmer, J.

Gwin, P.J. and Delaney, J. concur.

SGF/as 106

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.