Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014

State ex rel. Cotton v. Russo

State ex rel. Cotton v. Russo
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided October 3, 2014 · McCormack
2014 Ohio 4482

State ex rel. Cotton v. Russo

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. Cotton v. Russo, 2014-Ohio-4482.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101744

STATE EX REL., MILTON COTTON RELATOR vs. JUDGE JOHN J. RUSSO RESPONDENT

JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED

Writ of Mandamus Order No. 478797 Motion No. 477820

RELEASE DATE: October 3, 2014 FOR RELATOR Milton Cotton A234-317 Grafton Correctional Institution 2500 South Avon-Belden Road Grafton, OH 44044

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor 9th Floor Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, OH 44113 TIM McCORMACK, J.: {¶1} Milton Cotton, relator, has petitioned this court to issue a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to rule on his motions to correct void sentence filed on April 17, 2014, and May 12, 2014, in State v. Cotton, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-92-281730.

Respondent has filed a motion for summary judgment that Cotton has not opposed. For the reasons that follow, we grant respondent’s motion for summary judgment and deny relator’s complaint because it is moot.

{¶2} Respondent’s motion for summary judgment attached a copy of the trial court’s entry that was journalized on August 21, 2014, which demonstrates that a ruling has been rendered with regard to relator’s motions. “[R]elief is unwarranted because mandamus and procedendo will not compel the performance of a duty that has already been performed.” State ex rel. Hopson v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 135 Ohio St.3d 456, 2013-Ohio-1911, 989 N.E.2d 49, ¶ 4.

{¶3} Accordingly, we grant respondent’s motion for summary judgment and deny relator’s complaint for writ of mandamus. Costs are assessed against relator but are waived. The court directs the clerk of courts to serve all parties with notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).

{¶4} Writ denied.

__________________________________________ TIM McCORMACK, JUDGE KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, P.J., and MELODY J. STEWART, J., CONCUR

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.