[Cite as State v. Ramos,

.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 104550

STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

vs.

FRANK RAMOS DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED

Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-15-597573-A

BEFORE: Stewart, P.J., Laster Mays, J., and Jones, J.

RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: March 16, 2017 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

Erin R. Flanagan Erin R. Flanagan, Esq., Ltd. 75 Public Square, Suite 1325 Cleveland, OH 44113

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

Michael C. O’Malley Cuyahoga County Prosecutor

Mary Weston Assistant County Prosecutor Justice Center, 8th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, OH 44113 MELODY J. STEWART, P.J.:

{¶1} In July 2015, the grand jury returned a multiple count indictment charging

defendant-appellant Frank Ramos with counts of rape, aggravated burglary, and

kidnapping for offenses that occurred in July 1995. Defense counsel filed a motion to

dismiss the indictment on grounds of preindictment delay, but before the court could rule

on the motion, Ramos agreed to plead guilty to a single count of attempted rape. In this

appeal from that conviction, he complains that he did not receive the effective assistance

of counsel because counsel failed to raise the statute of limitations as a ground for

dismissing the indictment and failed to seek dismissal of the indictment on grounds of

preindictment delay.

{¶2} We summarily overrule the assignments of error. Ramos does not contest

the validity of his guilty plea, so that plea waived any claim of ineffective assistance of

counsel. State v. Fitzpatrick,

,

,

, ¶

78; State v. Vinson, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 103329,

. The

waiver rule applies equally to statute of limitations claims, State v. Brown,

,

(1st Dist. 1988), and the failure to seek dismissal of an

indictment on grounds of preindictment delay. State v. Brown, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No.

104095,

. Finally, the guilty plea waived the alleged,

nonjurisdictional defects in the indictment.

{¶3} Judgment affirmed. It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant costs herein taxed.

The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.

It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the common

pleas court to carry this judgment into execution.

A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of

the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

______________________________________________ MELODY J. STEWART, PRESIDING JUDGE

ANITA LASTER MAYS, J., and LARRY A. JONES, SR., J., CONCUR