Ohio Court of Appeals, 2017

State ex rel. Davidson v. Mandros

State ex rel. Davidson v. Mandros
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided August 28, 2017 · Mayle
2017 Ohio 7382

State ex rel. Davidson v. Mandros

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. Davidson v. Mandros, 2017-Ohio-7382.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY

State ex rel. Melvin Davidson Court of Appeals No. L-17-1207 Relator v. Judge Dean Mandros DECISION AND JUDGMENT Respondent Decided: August 28, 2017 ***** Melvin Davidson, pro se.

***** MAYLE, J.

{¶ 1} This case is before the court upon a complaint for writ of procedendo, filed on August 15, 2017, by relator, Melvin Davidson, against respondent, Judge Dean Mandros of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas. Davidson, an inmate of the Chillicothe Correctional Institution, claims that he filed a motion to correct a void sentence on June 6, 2016, and that Judge Mandros has failed to rule on the motion. He asks us to order Judge Mandros to issue a ruling on the motion.

{¶ 2} With his complaint, Davidson filed an affidavit of indigency asking us to waive the required filing fee. Under 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 7(A) and R.C. 2969.25(C), when the party bringing the action is incarcerated and seeks to have prepayment of the filing fees waived, he must provide a certificate from the institution at which he is incarcerated stating the amount of funds he has on deposit available to secure costs and a statement describing any other items of value that he owns. Davidson did not do this.

{¶ 3} Because Davidson failed to comply with 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 7(A) and R.C.

2969.25(C), we dismiss his complaint and order that he pay the costs of this action. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties, within three days, a copy of this decision in a manner prescribed by Civ.R. 5(B).

{¶ 4} It is so ordered.

Writ denied.

Mark L. Pietrykowski, J. _______________________________ JUDGE James D. Jensen, P.J. _______________________________ Christine E. Mayle, J. JUDGE CONCUR. _______________________________ JUDGE

2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.