[Cite as In G.G.,

.]

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT )

IN RE: G.G. C.A. Nos. 28574 T.G. 28587 C.L. 28594 F.B. J.G.

APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO CASE Nos. DN 14-02-0087 DN 14-02-0088 DN 14-02-0089 DN 14-02-0086 DN 14-02-0090

DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

Dated: September 27, 2017

CARR, Presiding Judge.

{¶1} Appellants-Parents (“Mother Amy”, “Mother Angel”, and “Father”) individually

appeal the judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, that

terminated their parental rights and placed the subject children in the permanent custody of

Summit County Children Services Board (“CSB”). This Court reverses and remands for further

proceedings.

I.

{¶2} Mother Amy is the biological mother of C.L., G.G., and T.G. Mother Angel is

the biological mother of F.B. and J.G. Father is the biological father of G.G., T.G., F.B., and

J.G. C.L.’s father is unknown and is not a party to these appeals. 2

{¶3} After a contested permanent custody hearing, the juvenile court awarded

permanent custody of all five children to CSB. All three parents appealed, raising numerous

assignments of error. At the oral argument, all parties stipulated to error regarding Mother

Amy’s first and second assignments of error, which related to the issue of a conflict of interest

during the permanent custody hearing. The conflict of interest issue relates to one attorney’s

application for and acceptance of imminent employment in CSB’s legal counsel department

during her representation of one of the parents. This Court agrees that the juvenile court

committed error requiring reversal and remand.

{¶4} Although it appears to this Court on the surface that counsel may be representing

adverse clients, and an inherent conflict of interest may exist pursuant to Prof.Cond.R. 1.7, this

Court cannot make that determination in the first instance on the limited record here.

Consequently, this matter is remanded to the juvenile court for a hearing including all parties to

determine the following: (1) if a conflict of interest was created by counsel’s acceptance of

employment with CSB during the course of the permanent custody hearing; (2) if so, whether

such a conflict of interest could be waived under the law; and (3) the impact of this type of

conflict of interest on (a) each of the parents, (b) the agency, and (c) the children. The juvenile

court failed to inquire regarding these issues when the conflict was disclosed below, and further

declined to include the parents in the limited discussion it had with the attorneys.

{¶5} This Court declines to address all other remaining assignments of error at this

time, because they have been rendered premature based on our remand.

II.

{¶6} Mother Amy’s first and second assignments of error are sustained. We decline to

address the parents’-appellants’ remaining twelve assignments of error as they are no longer ripe 3

for review. The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded to the Summit County Court of

Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, with instructions to conduct a hearing including all parties to

determine the issues enunciated above.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with instructions.

There were reasonable grounds for this appeal.

We order that a special mandate issue out of this Court, directing the Court of Common

Pleas, County of Summit, State of Ohio, to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy

of this journal entry shall constitute the mandate, pursuant to App.R. 27.

Immediately upon the filing hereof, this document shall constitute the journal entry of

judgment, and it shall be file stamped by the Clerk of the Court of Appeals at which time the

period for review shall begin to run. App.R. 22(C). The Clerk of the Court of Appeals is

instructed to mail a notice of entry of this judgment to the parties and to make a notation of the

mailing in the docket, pursuant to App.R. 30.

Costs taxed to Appellee.

DONNA J. CARR FOR THE COURT

CANNON, J. CONCURS.

(Cannon, J., of the Eleventh District Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.) 4

APPEARANCES:

DENISE E. FERGUSON, Attorney at Law, for Appellant.

GREGORY PRICE, Attorney at Law, for Appellant.

JASON WALLACE, Attorney at Law, for Appellant.

SHERRI BEVAN WALSH, Prosecuting Attorney, and RICHARD S. KASAY, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Appellee.

JOSEPH KERNAN, Guardian ad Litem.

GINA D’AURELIO, Attorney at Law, for the children.