Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019

State v. Sapp

State v. Sapp
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided February 19, 2019 · Per Curiam
2019 Ohio 589

State v. Sapp

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Sapp, 2019-Ohio-589.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2018-04-069 : DECISION - vs - 2/19/2019 : BRYAN R. SAPP a.k.a. BRIAN SAPP : Appellant :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR2017-08-1361

Michael T. Gmoser, Prosecuting Attorney, John C. Heinkel, Government Service Center, High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for appellee Michelle Temmel, 6 South Second Street, Suite 305, Hamilton, Ohio, 45011, for appellant

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by appellant, Bryan R. Sapp a.k.a. Brian Sapp, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶ 2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court ______________________ prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

S. POWELL, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.