Ohio Court of Appeals, 2021

State v. Washington

State v. Washington
Ohio Court of Appeals · Decided November 1, 2021 · Eklund
2021 Ohio 3883
State v. Washington

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Washington, 2021-Ohio-3883.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2021-P-0026

Plaintiff-Appellee,

Criminal Appeal from the -v- Municipal Court, Ravenna Division

TIANA CHANEL WASHINGTON,

Trial Court No. 2020 TRC 10902 R Defendant-Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Decided: November 1, 2021

Judgment: Appeal dismissed

Victor V. Vigluicci, Portage County Prosecutor, and Theresa M. Scahill, Assistant Prosecutor, 241 South Chestnut Street, Ravenna, OH 44266 (For Plaintiff-Appellee). Adam M. Van Ho, 243 Furnace Street, Suite 201, Akron, OH 44304 (For Defendant- Appellant).

JOHN J. EKLUND, J.

{¶1} Appellant, Tiana Chanel Washington, appeals from a February 11, 2021 entry of the Portage County Municipal Court, Ravenna Division. After finding appellant guilty of OVI, a first-degree misdemeanor, and speeding, a minor misdemeanor, the trial court sentenced her to a $475 fine; 180 days in jail, with 180 days suspended; and a one year driver’s license suspension.

{¶2} Appellee, the state of Ohio, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction indicating that the sentencing entry is not a final appealable order. Specifically, appellee contends that the appeal should be dismissed because the entry does not contain a separate sentence for each offense; rather, it just contains a “blanket sentence” for both convictions. State v. Clay, 11th Dist. Trumbull No. 2009-T-0126, 2010- Ohio-4558, ¶ 11; and State v. Garner, 11th Dist. Trumbull No. 2002-T-0025, 2003-Ohio- 5222, ¶ 7.

{¶3} No brief or memorandum in opposition to the motion has been filed by appellant.

{¶4} When only a single sentence is imposed after finding an appellant guilty of two different crimes, one of the offenses is left without a sentence, and this court is unable to determine to which offense the sentence applies. Thus, there is no final appealable order. Garner at ¶ 10. See also State v. Kelly, 11th Dist. Portage No. 2020-P-0077, 2021-Ohio-474.

{¶5} Therefore, it is ordered that appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

MARY JANE TRAPP, P.J., concurs, THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J., concurs in judgment only.

Case No. 2021-P-0026

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.