[Cite as State v. Smith, 2025-Ohio-2104.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT LOGAN COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 8-24-26 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, V. DONIVON J. SMITH, OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 8-24-27 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, V. DONIVON J. SMITH, OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Appeals from Logan County Common Pleas Court Trial Court Nos. CR 23 07 0173 and CR 23 09 0211 Appeals Dismissed Date of Decision: June 16, 2025

APPEARANCES: William T. Cramer for Appellant Eric C. Stewart for Appellee Case Nos. 8-24-26, 8-24-27

ZIMMERMAN, J.

{¶1} Defendant-appellant, Donivon J. Smith (“Smith”), appeals the April 18, 2024 judgment entries of sentence of the Logan County Court of Common Pleas.

For the reasons that follow, we dismiss appellate case numbers 8-24-26 and 8-24- 27.

{¶2} This case originates from a series of events in May, July, and August in 2023, culminating in three separate indictments against Smith. The initial incident on May 2, 2023 (case number CR23 09 0211) involved Smith shooting someone with a pellet gun at a local park.

{¶3} The second incident (case number CR23 07 0173) stemmed from a July 12, 2023 altercation at Oakland Square Park in Bellefontaine, Ohio where Smith, along with Kyle Richardson (“Richardson”) and another friend, were allegedly involved in a fight, and Smith subsequently threatened a victim. All three were indicted on August 9, 2023 for charges related to this Oakland Square Park incident.

Tragically, however, on the same day as this indictment, law enforcement found Richardson dead from a self-inflicted gunshot wound after a standoff.

{¶4} The third set of charges against Smith arose from events on August 14, 2023 (case number CR23 09 0221), during which Smith and his associates retaliated following Smith’s indictment related to the Oakland Square Park altercation and the subsequent death of Richardson. This retaliation encompassed three separate

-2- Case Nos. 8-24-26, 8-24-27

locations and incidents, beginning with an entry into a residence separate and apart from the subsequent drive-by shootings. First, around 1:00 am, Smith and several associates entered a residence on South Detroit Street in Bellefontaine, Ohio. Finding their intended target absent, they retreated but fired a bullet into a vehicle parked outside. Thereafter, they engaged in two separate drive-by shootings: the first around 1:08 am at a residence on West Brown in Oakland Square Park, and the second approximately fourteen minutes later, at 1:22 am at a residence on Crescent Drive in Russells Point, Ohio. The second drive-by shooting was undertaken at the request of Smith’s accomplice as a separate venture. In particular, the accomplice sent threatening text messages to a relative of the residents, indicating a separate and distinct motivation from the earlier shooting.

{¶5} On August 9, 2023, the Logan County Grand Jury indicted Smith in case number CR23 07 0173 on Count One of felonious assault in violation of R.C.

2903.11(A)(1), (D)(1)(a), a second-degree felony; Count Two of assault in violation of R.C. 2903.13(A), (C), a first-degree misdemeanor; Count Three of intimidation of an attorney, victim, or witness in a criminal case in violation of R.C.

2921.04(B)(1), (D), a third-degree felony; and Count Four of aggravated menacing in violation of R.C. 2903.21(A), (B), a first-degree misdemeanor. On August 11, 2023, Smith appeared for arraignment and entered pleas of not guilty.

{¶6} Thereafter, on September 12, 2023, the Logan County Grand Jury indicted Smith in case number CR23 09 0211 on a single count of felonious assault -3- Case Nos. 8-24-26, 8-24-27

in violation of R.C. 2903.11(A)(1), (D)(1)(a), a second-degree felony. Also on September 12, 2023, the Logan County Grand Jury indicted Smith in case number CR23 09 0221 on 12 Counts: Count One of complicity to aggravated burglary in violation of R.C. 2911.11(A)(1), 2923.03, a first-degree felony; Count Two of complicity to criminal damaging or endangering in violation of R.C. 2909.06(A)(1) and 2923.03, a second-degree misdemeanor; Counts Three and Eight of complicity to improperly discharging a firearm at or into a habitation or school safety zone in violation of R.C. 2923.161(A)(1) and 2923.03, second-degree felonies; Counts Four, Five, Nine, and Ten of complicity to felonious assault in violation of R.C.

2903.11(A)(2) and 2923.03, second-degree felonies; Counts Six, Seven, Eleven, and Twelve of complicity to attempted murder in violation of R.C. 2923.02(B), 2923.02, and 2923.03, first-degree felonies. The indictment included a three-year firearm specification under R.C. 2941.145(A) and a five-year discharge of a firearm from a motor vehicle (“drive-by”) specification under R.C. 2941.146(A) as to Counts Three through Twelve. Smith appeared for arraignment on September 15, 2023 and pleaded not guilty to the counts and specifications in the indictments in case numbers CR23 09 0211 and CR23 09 0221.

{¶7} On March 13, 2024, Smith withdrew his pleas of not guilty and entered a guilty plea to an amended Count One in case numbers CR23 07 0173 and CR23 0211 and to Counts Three and Eight along with the drive-by specifications in case number CR23 09 0221. In exchange for his change of pleas, the State agreed -4- Case Nos. 8-24-26, 8-24-27

to dismiss the remaining counts and specifications in case numbers CR23 07 0173 and CR23 09 0221, and to amend Count One in case numbers CR23 07 0173 and CR23 09 0211 to attempted felonious assault in violation of R.C. 2903.11(A)(1), (D)(1)(a), 2923.02, third-degree felonies. The trial court accepted Smith’s guilty pleas, found him guilty, dismissed the remaining counts and specifications in case number CR23 07 0173 and CR23 09 0221, and ordered a pre-sentence investigation.

{¶8} On April 17, 2023, the trial court sentenced Smith to 12 months in prison in case number CR23 07 0173, to 12 months in prison in case number CR23 0211, to a minimum term of 2 years to a maximum term of 3 years in prison on Count Three in case number CR23 09 0221, to 2 years on Count Eight in case number CR23 09 0221, and to 5 years as to each specification.1 The trial court ordered Smith to serve the prison terms imposed in case numbers CR23 07 0173, CR23 09 0211, and Count Three and the specifications in case number CR23 09 0221 consecutively. The trial court further ordered Smith to serve the prison term imposed as to Count Eight in case number CR23 09 0221 concurrently to the consecutive terms imposed as to case numbers CR23 07 0173, CR23 09 0211, and Count Three and the specifications in case number CR23 09 0221 for an aggregate prison sentence of a minimum term of 14 years to a maximum term of 15 years in prison.

The trial court filed its judgment entries of sentence on April 18, 2024.

-5- Case Nos. 8-24-26, 8-24-27

{¶9} Smith filed his notices of appeal on May 17, 2024 and this court consolidated the cases for purposes of appeal. Smith raises one assignment of error for our review.

Assignment of Error Appellant’s due process rights were violated when the trial court imposed two drive-by specification in violation of R.C.

2929.14(B)(1)(c)(iii).

{¶10} In his sole assignment of error, Smith argues that the trial court erred by imposing sentences on the drive-by specifications as to Counts Three and Eight imposed in case number CR23 09 0221, assigned appellate case number 8-24-28.

However, because Smith failed to assign any error as to case number CR23 07 0173, assigned appellate case number 8-24-26, or case number CR23 09 0211, assigned appellate case number 8-24-27, we dismiss those appellate cases. App.R. 12 and 16.

Appeals Dismissed WALDICK, P.J. and MILLER, J., concur. /hls

-6- Case Nos. 8-24-26, 8-24-27

JUDGMENT ENTRY For the reasons stated in the opinion of this Court, the instant appeal is dismissed with costs assessed to Appellant for which judgment is hereby rendered.

The cause is hereby remanded to the trial court for execution of the judgment for costs.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of this Court certify a copy of this Court’s judgment entry and opinion to the trial court as the mandate prescribed by App.R. 27; and serve a copy of this Court’s judgment entry and opinion on each party to the proceedings and note the date of service in the docket. See App.R. 30.

William R. Zimmerman, Judge

Juergen A. Waldick, Judge

Mark C. Miller, Judge DATED: /hls

-7-