Biddle v. Phipps
Opinion of the Court
The defendant in error held a mortgage on property assigned by Ware. The present trustee succeeded A. A. Clerke, assignee,
Held, that under Revised Statutes 6408, a bond for appeal must be given unless the appeal be in the interest of a trust, and that the common pleas court decided correctly that the action at bar was not for the benefit of the trust, but for the benefit of Clerke individually.
Judgment affirmed.
A second case between the same parties presented the same state of facts, except that in this case Clerke executed a bond before his decease, but failed to file the transcript in the common pleas court. This omission was corrected, as it was supposed, by the filing of the transcript by Mr. Biddle, Mr. Clerke’s successor in the management of the Ware trust.
Held, that Biddle has no right of recovery, and hence acted without authority in the filing of the transcript. By Revised Statutes 6409, it is made the duty of the person appealing to file the appeal in the court of common pleas. Possibly the personal representative of Clerke would have a right to file it, but certainly no such right attaches to his successor in the administration of the trust. Still another reason why Biddle could not recover was that he had never been substituted as the plaintiff in the case.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.