Bartley v. City of Cincinnati
Opinion of the Court
This was an action to enjoin the collection of certain portions of an assessment for the improvement of Falke street, in the city of Cincinnati. Said street was an unimproved street, and had been for forty years; was a main thoroughfare, and improvements were made to conform to the grade of the street. The case is in this court on error to the judgment of the court of common pleas.
The court of common pleas having found that the grade of Falke street, as re-established, was not better than the grade before, and now of no special benefit to the property abutting on the street, we are unable to see how the court could make an assessment against the abutting property to pay for damages resulting from the change of grade, said damages having been awarded to abutting property owners other than the plaintiffs herein, the latter having neglected to put in any claims for damages. For the same reason, we are unable to see why the abutting property should be assessed for the expense of changing the grade. It likewise was of no special benefit to the abutting property. The abutting property already had as good a grade as they had after the improvement. The change
[By the judgment of the court, the assessment for macadamizing only of the street as newly graded was left on the property.]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.