Ohio Circuit Courts, 1895

Kirby v. Kirby

Kirby v. Kirby
Ohio Circuit Courts · Decided July 1, 1895 · Smith
12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 736

Counsel

L. C, Black, for plaintiff in error., C. W. Baker, contra.

Kirby v. Kirby

Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.

We are of the opinion that the record in this case does not show > that in any respect the commissioners appointed to make a partition of 1 the lands held by the parties hereto, as tenants in common, have not ¡ acted in conformity of law or in prejudice of the rights of any of the j parties, or that the testimony taken clearly showed that the partition I made was unfair or unequal. To justify us in holding, it must be man- ! ilest from the evidence that such was the case, and it does not so appear. | The order ot the common pleas court confirming the partition made l will therefore be affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.