Miller v. Albright
Opinion of the Court
The only question raised and urged by counsel for the plaintiff in error, is as to the sufficiency of the notice of appeal. Was is given in time, and in the manner provided by law; so that the statutory requirements were complied with and an appeal perfected? Jn this respect the statutory provision is, Sec. 5227, Revised Statutes: “A person desiring to appeal his cause to the circuit court shall, within three days after the judgment or order is entered, enter on the records notice of such intention, etc.” Whether or not the notice of intention to appeal was sufficient in point of manner and time of entering on the record, depends upon the proper interpretation of the words of the section: “A party shall enter on the record notice of his intention within three days after the judgment or order is entered.” What is entering a judgment,, and what acts must a party perform to accomplish the entry of his .notice of intention to appeal on the record? As to the first proposition there is some confusion; the rendition, of a judgment and fhe entry, there
“The rendition of a judgment is the judicial act of the court pronouncing the sentence of the law upon the facts in controversy, as ascertained by the pleadings and the verdict. The entry of a judgment is a ministerial act, which consists in spreading upon the record a statement of the final conclusion reached by the court in the matter, thus furnishing external, incontestable evidence of the sentence given, and designed to stand as a perpetual memorial of its action. ”
If this interpretation is correct, then the act of recording the judgment on the journal of the court, by the clerk, is entering it, and a notice of intention to appeal is in time, under the provision of section 5227, Revised Statutes, if entered on the record within three days after the judgment is entered or recorded.
The party desiring to appeal his cause to the circuit court must enter on the record notice of his intention, says the section. It certainly was not the intention of the law making power, in formulating this section, to require the performance of an impracticable or impossible thing; and inasmuch as a party has no possession or control of the record, and cannot porperly perform the physical act of writing his notice of intention to appeal therein, it seems apparent such strictness of construction is not intended, but that liberal and reasonable interpretation is required, to the end that the remedial provision be not defeated or rendered unavailable. What, then, must a party do — what acts must be performed to accomplish the statutory require
On the facts, as made to appear by the bill of exceptions, we are unable to discover that error has intervened to the prejudice of the plaintiff in error, and the judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.