Ohio Circuit Courts, 1897

Ulman Einstein & Co. v. Effinger

Ulman Einstein & Co. v. Effinger
Ohio Circuit Courts · Decided May 5, 1897 · Adams, Dougiass, Pomerene
12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 746; 1897 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 566
Ulman Einstein & Co. v. Effinger

Opinion of the Court

Adams, J.

Memorandum of decision.

First. A judgment may be set aside for fraud notwithstanding the fact that no defense was made at the time it was rendered although the defendant was properly served with summons by copy thereof left at her usual place of residence.

Second. A judgment procured against a party on an account which she never owed, nor became neither directly nor indirectly liable for its payment, constitutes a fraud on the court rendering such judgment, which should be set aside in a proper proceeding brought for that purpose.

Third. An averment in a petition that goods or merchandise were sold to a husband, and that afterwards and before suit is brought to recover the price thereof, tUe plaintiffs insert the name of the wife of such husband in said account, and without her knowledge or consent, is a sufficient averment of fraud to constitute a cause of action, and a demurrer to such petition and pertinent interrogatories attached thereto is properly overruled.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.