Ohio Circuit Courts, 1899

Blank v. Altenau

Blank v. Altenau
Ohio Circuit Courts · Decided January 15, 1899 · Cox, Smith, Swing
19 Ohio C.C. 635

Counsel

Louis J. Dolle, for Plaintiff in Error., Charles F. Droste, contra.

Blank v. Altenau

Opinion of the Court

By the Court:

The plaintiff below sued on a judgment against Sarah Brown, obtained during,the January term, 1897, upon which there is *636an unsatisfied balance of $296.31. He claimed that this judgment became a lien on property on Price Hill, sold and transferred during that term of court to the present plaintiff in error. The court below sustained a demurrer to the purchaser’s answer, and granted a decree for sale.

Louis J. Dolle, for Plaintiff in Error. Charles F. Droste, contra.

The reviewing court holds that Sarah Brown lost her right of homestead by the transfer; that the judgment is a lien on the property in question; but the purchaser having paid back-taxes and an old mortgage is subrogated to those claims.

Judgment reversed, demurrer overruled and cause remanded for further proceedings.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.