Ohio Circuit Courts, 1907

Segal v. Eagle Building Co.

Segal v. Eagle Building Co.
Ohio Circuit Courts · Decided May 21, 1907 · Giffen, Smith, Swing
21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 519

Counsel

Phares, Gusweiler & Phares, for plaintiff in error., Bates & Meyers, for defendant in error.

Segal v. Eagle Building Co.

Opinion of the Court

GIFFEN, J.

As appears from the findings of fact the only question involved is whether, in a proceeding to sell real estate by an administrator to pay debts of decedent, heirs, who are idiots, are parties to the record' when not made parties to the petition but their legal guardian filed an answer in which she as such guardian expressly waived the issuing and service of summons upon her wards — admitted the allegations of the petition to be true and ask that the prayer of the petition be granted? We think they are such parties and bound by the sale made. Ewing v. Hollister. 7 Ohio (pt. 2) 138; Section 6143 Rev. Stat.

Judgment reversed and judgment for plaintiff in error.

Swing and Smith, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.