Ohio Circuit Courts, 1908

Commercial Tribune Bldg. Co. v. Rapid Electrotype Co.

Commercial Tribune Bldg. Co. v. Rapid Electrotype Co.
Ohio Circuit Courts · Decided January 25, 1908 · Giffen, Smith, Swing
21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 361

Counsel

Mallon & Vordenberg, for plaintiff:, ■ Johnson &. Levy, for defendant.

Commercial Tribune Bldg. Co. v. Rapid Electrotype Co.

Opinion of the Court

GIFFEN, J.

The defendant, as lessee of the third floor of a building belonging to the plaintiff, constructed a partition across the same, for the purpose of subletting a part thereof, the upper part being of glass and the lower part being of wood fitting into the groove of a cleat which was nailed to the floor. At the edges and at the top it was wedged but not' otherwise fastened to the walls or the ceiling, and could easily be removed without doing any substantial injury to the building.

Held: The nature of the article affixed, the relation of landlord and tenant, the structure and mode of annexation, and the purpose or use for subletting a portion of the floor space, show no intention to make the partition a permanent accession to the freehold. Teaff v. Hewitt, 1 Ohio St. 511 [59 Am. Dec. 634]; Brown v. Wallis, 115 Mass. 156.

Injunction dissolved and petition dismissed.

Swing and-Smith, JJ., concur,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.